Navigating the Flood: How Rising Insurance Costs Threaten Communities Amid Climate Change  

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)’s Risk Rating 2.0 program, implemented in October 2021, represents a significant overhaul of the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP) pricing methodology. While the new system aims to more accurately align flood insurance premiums with individual property risks, it has sparked both praise and controversy. The State of Louisiana filed suit against FEMA arguing that it has not provided sufficient transparency regarding the new rating system. Louisiana’s political leadership, including the governor and congressional representatives from both parties, have been advocating for FEMA to reconsider its flood risk assessments in vulnerable regions. They argue that the current Risk Rating 2.0 system fails to adequately account for the significant investmentsmade in flood protection and storm resilience infrastructure since major disasters like Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 and the severe flooding that impacted the Baton Rouge area in 2016. These leaders contend that these substantial improvements in flood mitigation should be reflected in FEMA’s risk calculations. The lawsuit demands more information about the risk model, which they claim relies on “undisclosed, hypothetical, and abstract possibilities.” The lack of comprehensive information provided directly to policyholders has also been identified as a significant issue.

CFPB Proposed New Rules to Expedite Mortgage Assistance

Earlier this year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced proposed rule changes to provide additional relief for homeowners struggling to make mortgage payments. The changes aim to amend the 2013 regulations governing mortgage servicing, ensuring that borrowers can more easily access mortgage assistance and therefore reduce the risk of unnecessary foreclosures. This comes at a time when economic uncertainties and evolving market conditions make it critical for homeowners to have quick access to resources to avoid foreclosures. The new proposal, if finalized, is designed to simplify the process for borrowers seeking mortgage assistance, improve communication between borrowers and servicers, and add safeguards to protect homeowners.

Caffeine Can Cause a Scene: Why the FDA Should Require Disclosure of Caffeine Content

On May 7, 2024, Panera Bread removed its popular line of ‘charged’ lemonade beverages from its menu following multiple lawsuits alleging that the caffeine content of the drink led to death or serious health problems of customers. One such death occurred in September 2022 when a 21-year-old woman unknowingly consumed 390 milligrams of caffeine in one charged lemonade drink which aggravated her heart condition and led to cardiac arrest. These lawsuits highlight the dangerous reality of caffeine consumption which likely could have been avoided if Panera Bread had clearly displayed the caffeine content of its drinks. However, Panera Bread was under no regulatory obligation to display the caffeine content due to a major gap in the current beverage labeling regulation from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which does not require any disclosure of caffeine quantity. This regulatory gap poses a growing risk to consumers as new energy drink brands continue to enter the market and push competition by increasing the amount of caffeine packed into each product. In order to fulfill its obligation to public safety, the FDA must introduce regulations to standardize the disclosure of caffeine content to allow consumers to make informed decisions about the products they are choosing.

EPA Issued First Emergency Ban of Pesticide in 40 Years –But Why Has It Taken So Long?

On August 6, 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) resurrected its emergency authority for the first time in more than 40 years to prohibit the use of a common herbicide, dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA, or Dacthal) under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIRFA) because of the chemical’s danger to human health. The last time the EPA exercised this power was in 1979, when the EPA banned the chemical weed killer Agent Orange which was known to cause serious birth defects and used by the United States military in the Vietnam War. The EPA has since remained reluctant to classify any other herbicide chemical as an imminent risk to the public health, until last month.

States Taking Initiative: Extending Collective Bargaining Rights to Formally Excluded Groups

In the upcoming November election, Massachusetts voters will decide on the issue posed by a ballot initiative known as “Question 3.” The ballot initiative would allow rideshare drivers, like those employed by Uber and Lyft, to form unions and engage in collective bargaining with their employers. This is a right which rideshare drivers, who are currently classified as independent contractors, are excluded from under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). The initiative proposed in Massachusetts could spark the beginning of a movement to extend worker protections, like collective bargaining, to groups formally excluded.

Boeing’s Missteps Lead to Heavier Congressional Oversight

Boeing’s controversial history including the publicized suicide of one of its whistleblowers shortly before his deposition to TikTok videos of panels blowing off mid-air or planes catching fire have prompted public scrutiny. These events, mainly the latter, have raised also questions about Boeing’s compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations the Department of Justice (DOJ) rulings. However, this is not the first time these concerns have come to light.   

Can Cutting Red Tape Improve Chicago’s Affordable Housing Crisis?

On April 5th, 2024, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson published the Cut the Tape Report as part of his administration’s focus on confronting Chicago’s affordable housing shortage. The report marks the completion of the first step in the process put in place by Mayor Johnson’s Executive Order 2023-21. The order aimed to identify inefficiencies and redundancies in the city’s administrative processes to shorten Chicago’s residential and commercial development timelines. The report resulted from collaboration between fourteen city departments, numerous external stakeholders, and six peer cities, identifying over 100 recommendations for improvements to the development process.

IRS & Treasury to Crack Down on Basis Shifting Among Complex Partnerships

On June 17, 2024, the Biden Administration issued a press release detailing plans to push forward a new multi-stage regulatory initiative targeting tax evasion among large business partnerships. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and U.S. Treasury Department will lead the charge to end abuses of a practice known as “basis shifting,” often used by complex partnerships to maximize deductions and consequentially minimize tax liability.

The Future of EV Vehicles: Tesla’s EV Connector Becoming the National Standard

For the first time ever, American automotive company Tesla will open a portion of its U.S. Superchargers and Destination Charger network for non-Tesla electric vehicles (“EVs”)–including 7,500 of its chargers–following an action by the Department of Transportation and Energy. The Department of Transportation and Energy finalized the new standards to make charging EVs more convenient and reliable for consumers. Other companies in the private sector, including Hertz, bp, and General Motors, will also establish a network of chargers using the Tesla charging ports. The Biden-Harris Administration is lending its support for EV standardization, attempting to make Tesla’s charging ports the industry standard for EV charging in America. This new regulatory framework seeks to establish the Biden-Harris Administration’s “Made in America” policies, which include revolutionizing the country’s EV charging network so that the “great American road trip” can be electrified.

The “Revolving Door” of the FDA and its Public Safety Impacts

It’s no secret that prior Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators, who managed drug approvals, often get comfortable, high-paying jobs at the same companies that produce those drugs and products, nor is it anything new. This is the “revolving door” of the FDA. The “revolving door” refers to the movement of employees from regulatory agencies to the private corporations they regulate. This phenomenon occurs at every level of employment from standard regulators to senior staff and high-ranking employees. In fact, every FDA commissioner since 2000 has gone on to work for a large corporation regulated by the FDA, which raises ethical concerns regarding the agency’s ability to regulate drug manufacturers without any conflict of interests or corruption. Despite the FDA’s claims that its ethics rules, in accordance with federal laws, prevent FDA regulators and employees from engaging in conflicts of interest by accepting these types of employment positions, the revolving door remains prevalent between the FDA and private pharmaceutical companies. Not only does this raise concerns about conflicts of interest and the integrity of regulatory decisions, but it also negatively impacts the country’s public health and safety because drugs and other pharmaceutical products are introduced to the market with FDA approval that otherwise should not have been due to dangerous side effects, addictive nature, or other perverse factors pertaining to the specific products.