Category:Regulation
Roadside Service in the Final Frontier: The Compliance Void in On-Orbit Servicing
In 2024, a Japanese commercial satellite maneuvered to within 15 meters of a derelict piece of debris floating in low Earth orbit, a feat never accomplished by a private company – until now. Astroscale Holdings, operating under a contract with the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), executed a precise series of approach maneuvers around a completely unresponsive object. This was a genuine technological milestone in the commercial space industry, and just a preview of an entire industry that existing legal frameworks were not built to govern or foresee.
Evolving Technology in Law Enforcement: Concerns and Solutions
Facial recognition technology has become widespread in consumer and commercial environments, and particularly law enforcement. Despite numerous benefits, these systems raise great concerns about privacy and data protection. The current legal frameworks are not strong enough to effectively manage the risks. No federal laws currently exist to regulate the use of facial recognition technology. Instead, enforcement is left to the states. Without aggressive state initiatives, use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement will continue unabated. This will result in data collection mired in algorithmic bias and will result in a complete disregard of civil liberties.
Hidden Ingredients: The Urgent Need to Regulate Microplastics in What We Eat and Drink
Carolyn Nsimpasi
Associate Editor
Loyola University Chicago School of Law, JD 2026
A toothbrush. Gum. Polyester clothing. All these items contain tiny plastic fragments known as microplastics, and even smaller nanoplastics. These particles are so small that they slip through water filtration systems, drift through the air, and accumulate in the food and beverages we consume daily. What was once considered a distant environmental issue has now increasingly become a direct human health concern, one that demands urgent regulation.
Slack, Teams, and WhatsApp: The Expanding Scope of Business Records in Digital Communication
The definition of a “business record” has evolved significantly in response to the proliferation of digital communication platforms. Historically, organizations focused on formal documentation, such as emails, signed contracts, and official reports, as the primary sources of recordkeeping. However, the widespread adoption of real-time messaging tools such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, and WhatsApp has fundamentally altered how business decisions are communicated and documented. Messages that include approvals, negotiations, instructions, or the exchange of sensitive information may all qualify as business records. Consequently, organizations must broaden their conceptualization of recordkeeping to include informal and semi-formal communication channels alike, as technology and record keeping mechanisms are quickly expanding.
Cooking in the Dark: The Rise and Fall of Ghost Kitchens
Online food delivery is a growing industry worth over $240 billion, serving consumers who appreciate eating their favorite meals from the comfort of their home. Ghost kitchens are one way restaurant entrepreneurs are taking advantage of this growing market. Ghost kitchens operate as takeout and delivery only venues, needing only a fraction of traditional restaurant space to operate. Today there are over 7,000 businesses in the ghost kitchen industry in the United States. This model was embraced by celebrities like Mr. Beast and large restaurant chains, including Chili’s, and was particularly popular during the COVID-19 pandemic. While these kitchens operate in the dark, they are still responsible for complying with food quality and safety rules like traditional restaurants. However, this has proven to be difficult and resulted in closures – and even lawsuits. Ghost kitchens require greater investigation and monitoring from governmental agencies to better meet consumer concerns.
Navigating Oil: Corporate Strategy in a Volatile Market
On February 28, 2026, a conflict involving the United States and Iran began when coordinated airstrikes targeting Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure took place. In response, the Iranian military launched retaliatory missile and drone strikes targeting U.S. bases and U.S. allied countries Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Alongside these military strikes, the Iranian government has taken de facto control over the crucial Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway in the Middle East that borders Iran. The strait connects the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and is a key export pathway for oil and gas to many countries across the world. It is estimated that 20% of the world’s oil supply flows through the strait. With exports through the strait now significantly disrupted, global energy markets have begun to experience a sharp supply shock. Corporations, particularly in the energy, transportation, and manufacturing sectors, are now facing heightened regulatory scrutiny and compliance risk as they attempt to navigate significant cost pressures and operational uncertainty.
The Court Struck Down the Tariffs but the Compliance Nightmare Got Worse
For companies that spent the past year paying billions in tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), February 20, 2026 looked like a victory. The Supreme Court ruled that the IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. But, if compliances officer, general counsel, and importers should not celebrate yet. The ruling did not end the tariff saga; it merely opened a new and more chaotic chapter.
The Government’s Block of Anthropic and the Future of AI Procurement
Governments around the world have increasingly turned to artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for defense and national security. In the United States, that shift has come with its share of conflict. In early 2026, a dispute between the federal government and AI company Anthropic came to a head after the Trump administration moved to bar the Pentagon from using Anthropic’s Claude software. At its core, the standoff exposed a tension that is only going to grow more common: tech companies that want to set limits on how their products are used, versus a government that sees those limits as a threat to its own capabilities. The Department of Defense had previously brought Claude into certain internal tools and workflows. But Anthropic’s restrictions on military use created friction with agencies that wanted broader access to the software. When those disagreements proved unresolvable, the administration granted agencies six months to stop using Anthropic products entirely, turning what had been a contract dispute into one of the more public clashes between Washington and a tech company in recent memory.
Betting on Compliance: Regulatory Challenges for Online Sports Betting Apps
The explosive growth of online sports betting in the United States over the past decade has created a complex regulatory frontier for digital wagering platforms. After the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the federal ban on sports gambling in Murphy v. NCAA, states have individually determined how and whether to legalize mobile sports wagering. This state-by-state patchwork, combined with the rise of innovative betting products, has generated compliance challenges in age verification, geolocation enforcement, consumer protection, anti-money laundering obligations, and advertising—issues that extend far beyond traditional in-person gambling regulation.
The Real Problem with Affordable Housing in America is Not Large Institutional Investors
“To preserve the supply of single-family homes for American families and increase the paths to homeownership,” President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 20th, 2026, preventing “large institutional investors” from buying “single-family home[’s].” The definitions of “large institutional investor” and “single-family home” are to be determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent, by February 19th. However, even with an expansive definition of what constitutes a “large institutional investor,” this executive order seems likely to fall short of its intended goal. Large institutional investors account for too small of a share of single-family homeowners in the United States for this executive order to have any significant impact on housing affordability. Instead, to support housing affordability President Trump’s administration should focus on loosening credit standards, incentivizing home builders, and adopting economic policies to curb inflation, which in turn will lead to mortgage rate reductions.