Category:Environmental
Environmental Groups Challenge EPA’s Rescission of Greenhouse Gas Regulations
Climate-related regulation remains one of the most politically and legally contested areas within the federal government, with regulatory direction often shifting alongside presidential administrations. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) protects human health and the environment by developing and enforcing regulations based on scientific evidence. The administrator of the EPA is nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. As a result, the EPA’s regulatory determinations often reflect the policy beliefs and priorities of the current administration. On February 12, 2026, the EPA finalized its rescission of the endangerment finding, which served as the legal basis for regulating greenhouse gases, including greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles. Through its reversal, the EPA has introduced substantial regulatory uncertainty for the automotive industry and has set the stage for consequential legal, economic, and climate policy developments in the months ahead.
The Removal of the Endangerment Finding and its Aftershocks
The endangerment finding (EF) is the bedrock of environmental regulation within the United States. Founded on the basis of the the ruling in Massachusetts v. EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the “endangerment finding,” which declares two things. First, that greenhouse gases threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. Second, that the combined emissions of the greenhouse gases from motor vehicles contributes to overall greenhouse gas pollution, which in turn also threatens public health and welfare. This was the case. The EPA has repealed this finding. Now, the EPA lacks statutory authority under Section (a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards for motor vehicles and other industries. Now, the EPA is no longer legally required to regulate pollutants such as GHGs. There is no longer any federal legal foundation to regulate vehicle, industrial or power plant emissions.
Corporate Non-Compliance in Environmental Regulation
Corporations and other firms maximize profits. Without profits, the corporation or the firm fails. Thus, regulations imposed by regulatory agencies become a hindrance. Businesses dealing in fossil fuels and other natural resources especially feel the impacts of these regulations. Specifically, environmental regulation that requires detailed reporting and measurement can become awfully cumbersome for these companies. Not surprisingly, these companies tend to take different paths to avoid abiding by these regulations.
Dire Wolves Highlight Dire Need for De-extinction Regulation
On April 7, 2025, Colossal Biosciences announced that it had successfully created dire wolves, a species that had been extinct for over 10,000 years, in what is considered a breakthrough in the science of de-extinction. Although it sounds like a work of science fiction, Colossal used dire wolf DNA found in a 13,000-year-old tooth and a 72,000-year-old ear bone to make 20 edits to the DNA of modern gray wolves leading to the birth of 3 dire wolf puppies in the fall and winter of 2024. While the science community both celebrates the breakthroughs in genetic engineering, considers the benefits that this technology can have on modern endangered species, and debates the validity of calling genetically modified gray wolves true dire wolves, it is clear that the regulatory framework of the United States is not yet sufficiently prepared to examine the legal and ethical considerations that come with de-extinction technologies. Though dire wolves were the breakthrough, they are not the end goal for Colossal as it now turns its focus to other popular extinct species such as the wooly mammoth, dodo bird, and Tasmanian tiger. To adequately keep up with these changes in genetic and environmental science, the United States must act quickly to develop an agile multi-agency regulatory framework that can guide the country and world as a whole safely into the new age of de-extinction.
The Cost of Efficiency: National Parks at Risk
On February 14, the Trump administration fired approximately 1,000 National Park Service (NPS) employees as part of a program led by Elon Musk and the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which is designed to eliminate federal jobs and to cut federal spending. The President did not announce the firings publicly, but Democratic Congressmen have confirmed and denounced the layoffs in a letter written by Sens. Jeff Merkley and Angus King and signed by twenty other senators. Since then, some NPS positions have been reinstated, but the situation raises real concerns about the future of conservation in the United States, as well as individuals and communities whose livelihoods depend on the economic well-being of our parks.
From Lab to Table: The Future of Regulating Lab-Grown Meat
Human organs grown in labs, lab-grown diamonds, lab-grown plants, and now lab-grown meat. Companies like Upside Foods and GOOD Meat are growing meat from animal cells. Companies have developed a cell line to produce high-quality meat, grow and feed the cells with a “blend of nutrients,” and in two to three weeks, meat is ready to be cultivated and molded into the shape of meat, like a chicken filet. Now, lab-grown meat is commercialized and has been approved by the Agriculture Department for production and sale. Although it could be a few years until lab-produced meat is in grocery stores, regulations need to be approved and put into place just like slaughterhouse meat.
Navigating the Flood: How Rising Insurance Costs Threaten Communities Amid Climate Change
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)’s Risk Rating 2.0 program, implemented in October 2021, represents a significant overhaul of the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP) pricing methodology. While the new system aims to more accurately align flood insurance premiums with individual property risks, it has sparked both praise and controversy. The State of Louisiana filed suit against FEMA arguing that it has not provided sufficient transparency regarding the new rating system. Louisiana’s political leadership, including the governor and congressional representatives from both parties, have been advocating for FEMA to reconsider its flood risk assessments in vulnerable regions. They argue that the current Risk Rating 2.0 system fails to adequately account for the significant investmentsmade in flood protection and storm resilience infrastructure since major disasters like Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 and the severe flooding that impacted the Baton Rouge area in 2016. These leaders contend that these substantial improvements in flood mitigation should be reflected in FEMA’s risk calculations. The lawsuit demands more information about the risk model, which they claim relies on “undisclosed, hypothetical, and abstract possibilities.” The lack of comprehensive information provided directly to policyholders has also been identified as a significant issue.
Shein’s IPO: Stitching Profits with Controversy
In late 2023, fast-fashion retailer Shein filed to go public in the U.S. markets, which has been delayed because of tensions between the U.S. and China. On June 3, 2024, , which was predicted due to the delay in the U.S. markets. Although the company is well known its clothing prices and its value reported at $66 billion in 2023, the company faces controversy due to its ties to China, negative environmental impact, and alleged forced labor practices.
The Potential Impacts of Artificial Intelligence in the Environmental Context
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has been quickly evolving over the past few years, satisfying unexpected needs and allowing for innovative solutions to different problems. More recently, environmental organizations are increasingly interested in potential AI solutions for environmental issues. AI has the potential to streamline regulatory compliance in the environmental context by switching the approach of environmental regulation from responding to current problems into prevention of future problems through data analysis, predictive analysis, and easier reporting procedures for violations of environmental regulation.
EPA Re-Defines “Waterways” in New Rule Following Sackett v. EPA
EPA Re-Defines “Waterways” in New Rule Following Sackett v. EPA Amanda Lane Associate Editor Loyola University Chicago School of Law, JD 2025 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of the Army (together, Agencies) issued an amended final rule in August of 2023 revising the definition of “waters of the United States” following the …
Read more