Navigating the Shifting Tides of Regulatory Compliance in Climate Policy

The United States finds itself at a regulatory crossroads when it comes to environmental policy. The current administration’s efforts to block state climate regulations through executive action stand in stark contrast to the growing movement of state governments implementing stringent greenhouse gas reporting requirements. This divergence creates a complex compliance landscape where businesses must simultaneously adapt to federal deregulation while meeting expanding state-level environmental mandates. This tension between federal and state approaches to climate regulation presents both challenges and opportunities for corporate compliance programs. As federal agencies scale back environmental oversight, progressive states are filling the regulatory void with ambitious climate policies that often exceed previous federal standards. This blog examines this emerging dichotomy, explores its implications for business operations, and provides strategic guidance for maintaining compliance in this evolving landscape.

Chicago’s Bold New Vision: Green Social Housing for a Sustainable, Equitable Future

Last week, Chicago City Council committees on Housing and Finance convened for negotiations and discussions on a monumental—and markedly contentious—green social housing plan. This comes nearly two months after Mayor Brandon Johnson and the Chicago Department of Housing introduced an enabling ordinance in the Chicago City Council, allowing the City to establish an independent nonprofit with the authority to serve as the Green Social Housing (GSH) developer. The GSH model tackles both housing insecurity and climate change head-on by developing permanently affordable, energy-efficient homes in every community. Spearheaded by the Chicago Department of Housing and the Illinois Green New Deal coalition, this initiative is poised to reshape how housing is built, owned, and lived in across the city.

Dire Wolves Highlight Dire Need for De-extinction Regulation

On April 7, 2025, Colossal Biosciences announced that it had successfully created dire wolves, a species that had been extinct for over 10,000 years, in what is considered a breakthrough in the science of de-extinction. Although it sounds like a work of science fiction, Colossal used dire wolf DNA found in a 13,000-year-old tooth and a 72,000-year-old ear bone to make 20 edits to the DNA of modern gray wolves leading to the birth of 3 dire wolf puppies in the fall and winter of 2024. While the science community both celebrates the breakthroughs in genetic engineering, considers the benefits that this technology can have on modern endangered species, and debates the validity of calling genetically modified gray wolves true dire wolves, it is clear that the regulatory framework of the United States is not yet sufficiently prepared to examine the legal and ethical considerations that come with de-extinction technologies. Though dire wolves were the breakthrough, they are not the end goal for Colossal as it now turns its focus to other popular extinct species such as the wooly mammoth, dodo bird, and Tasmanian tiger. To adequately keep up with these changes in genetic and environmental science, the United States must act quickly to develop an agile multi-agency regulatory framework that can guide the country and world as a whole safely into the new age of de-extinction.

Rearming Innovation: The Rise of New Players in U.S. Defense

In recent decades, the U.S. defense sector has undergone a significant transformation with innovative companies such Palantir, Space X, and Anduril pushing for the federal government to reconsider its current procurement process. The goal of these “New Age” companies is to level the playing field in government contracting so that they can continue developing the world’s most advanced and effective defense technologies.

One Size Doesn’t Fit All: OSHA’s PPE Rule For Construction Workers

The construction industry employs workers of diverse shapes and sizes. Despite their diverse sizes, many construction workers have had to make do with Personal Protection Equipment (“PPE”) that fits one standard size. To ensure these construction workers have properly fitting PPE, regardless of their size, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) published their final rule mandating that construction employers provide their employees with “properly fitting” PPE. 

Navigating Data Subject Rights Requests: Balancing Compliance with Mitigating Misuse

In the wake of heightened awareness around data privacy and protection, regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States have emerged as trailblazers. These laws bestow significant rights upon individuals, allowing them to control and protect their personal data. At the heart of these regulations lies the concept of Data Subject Rights Requests (DSRR), also known by a similar name of Data Subject Access Requests (DSAR). This article offers strategies to combat the weaponizing DSRRs while complying with the requirements for legitimate requests.

Operation Stork Speed: A Great Opportunity if Executed Correctly

In March, the FDA announced Operation Stork Speed in response to a Consumer Reports investigation which found traces of toxic chemicals in baby formula. Secretary of HHS, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has directed the FDA to begin several new initiatives and increase the scrutiny of testing to find ways to have better access to safe baby formula. Operation Stork Speed will begin a comprehensive review of the nutrient list that is currently approved by the FDA and increase labeling transparency with industry. Although created in response to the Consumer Reports findings, a ProPublica investigation published on April 4th has led to concerning claims about unsanitary practices within an Abbot Labs factory. The same Michigan-based factory that shutdown in 2022, after reports of infant hospitalizations and deaths due to this facility’s formula, causing a nationwide shortage. Given the added issues with the factory, if done correctly, Operation Stork Speed could begin to solve the safety issues that have recently plagued the baby formula industry.

The European Accessibility Act is Looming as Corporations Race to Comply

The European Accessibility Act (the Act/EAA) aims to increase market opportunities for accessible products and services on both the consumer and business level. Accessibility is an essential factor in making buying decisions in today’s world; showing that companies are committed to diversity and inclusion in a time where it is increasingly important. The Act covers a wide variety of products and services that are important for those with disabilities and that may not be accessible across the European Union (EU). Such products and services include: computers or operating systems, smartphones, audio-visual media services, banking services, etc. Although the European Accessibility Act is advertised as a manageable compliance requirement, inconsistent enforcement across EU member states, vague exemptions, and widespread corporate unpreparedness suggest that it will be a significant regulatory challenge.

The Corporate Transparency Act: Now Featuring Much Less Transparency

Among some of the big changes being made by the new Administration is the intention to no longer enforce the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) against U.S. citizens and domestic reporting companies. The CTA, enacted back in 2021, was designed and implemented to enhance corporate accountability and combat financial crimes like money laundering, fraud, tax evasion, and the like. It requires certain businesses to disclose their beneficial owners to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) with the goal of increasing transparency in corporate structures and organization. However, some recent developments have led to significant changes in the ability to enforce this act, sparking a lot of debate on the implications of (or without) the act.

REAL ID or Bureaucratic Overreach? A Closer Look at the Federal Mandate

As the long-postponed REAL ID deadline approaches in May 2025, states are scrambling to issue the updated identification cards amid public confusion and operational strain. Despite being marketed as a streamlined security measure, the REAL ID Act continues to spark debate nearly two decades after its passage—raising concerns about federal overreach, inconsistent implementation, and whether the program’s costs outweigh its benefits.