Navigating Oil: Corporate Strategy in a Volatile Market

On February 28, 2026, a conflict involving the United States and Iran began when coordinated airstrikes targeting Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure took place. In response, the Iranian military launched retaliatory missile and drone strikes targeting U.S. bases and U.S. allied countries Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Alongside these military strikes, the Iranian government has taken de facto control over the crucial Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway in the Middle East that borders Iran. The strait connects the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and is a key export pathway for oil and gas to many countries across the world. It is estimated that 20% of the world’s oil supply flows through the strait. With exports through the strait now significantly disrupted, global energy markets have begun to experience a sharp supply shock. Corporations, particularly in the energy, transportation, and manufacturing sectors, are now facing heightened regulatory scrutiny and compliance risk as they attempt to navigate significant cost pressures and operational uncertainty.

Returning to the Roots of College Sports: Pathways Forward

College sports once featured iconic teams of students that would return year after year to compete for glory in tournaments like March Madness and the College Football Playoff. Now, teams are sparsely populated with returning players. Prior to the start of the 2025 March Madness tournament, more than half of the players that competed in the tournament played for a different D1 team before the start of the season. Following the advent of NIL (“Name, Image, and Likeness”), and recent rule changes surrounding the transfer portal, college sports are more like a professional, free-agent market. Team loyalty and the once classic “underdog” Cinderella stories are a thing of the past.

Click, Share, Mislead: Why Social Media Needs Regulation

Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate, access news, and share information. Social networks such as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X allow information to spread instantly to millions of users around the world. While this connectivity has countless benefits, it has also made it easier for misinformation and false narratives to circulate widely, often faster than accurate information. The spread of misleading content can influence public opinion, undermine trust in government institutions, and affect important events such as elections and public health responses. As a result, social media platforms should be fairly and reasonably regulated to reduce misinformation while still protecting freedom of expression.

Come On Down: Dynamic Pricing Is the New Price Tag

Retail pricing is undergoing a significant technological shift. Instead of relying on fixed price tags, many businesses now use dynamic pricing systems that adjust prices automatically based on real-time data. These systems analyze factors such as demand, competitor pricing, inventory levels, and consumer behavior to determine what price to display at a given moment. Dynamic pricing is already prevalent in many industries, such as live entertainment, airlines, hotels, and ride-sharing platforms, all of which routinely adjust prices in response to changing demand. Increasingly, retailers and e-commerce platforms are adopting similar strategies in everyday consumer markets. As this practice expands, regulators are evaluating how existing consumer protection, antitrust, and data privacy laws apply to algorithm-driven pricing models.

The Court Struck Down the Tariffs but the Compliance Nightmare Got Worse

For companies that spent the past year paying billions in tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), February 20, 2026 looked like a victory. The Supreme Court ruled that the IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. But, if compliances officer, general counsel, and importers should not celebrate yet. The ruling did not end the tariff saga; it merely opened a new and more chaotic chapter.

The Government’s Block of Anthropic and the Future of AI Procurement

Governments around the world have increasingly turned to artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for defense and national security. In the United States, that shift has come with its share of conflict. In early 2026, a dispute between the federal government and AI company Anthropic came to a head after the Trump administration moved to bar the Pentagon from using Anthropic’s Claude software. At its core, the standoff exposed a tension that is only going to grow more common: tech companies that want to set limits on how their products are used, versus a government that sees those limits as a threat to its own capabilities. The Department of Defense had previously brought Claude into certain internal tools and workflows. But Anthropic’s restrictions on military use created friction with agencies that wanted broader access to the software. When those disagreements proved unresolvable, the administration granted agencies six months to stop using Anthropic products entirely, turning what had been a contract dispute into one of the more public clashes between Washington and a tech company in recent memory.

Green Waters, Gray Areas: Chicago’s St. Patrick’s Day Tradition and Environmental Regulations

Kendall Henry Associate Editor Loyola University Chicago School of Law, JD 2027  Every March, Chicago’s St. Patrick’s Day celebration involves one of the most recognizable traditions in the country: dyeing the Chicago River shamrock green. To Chicago residents and tourists alike, it is a prelude to the spring season, but beyond the bright green surface …
Read more

But How Much Is It Actually? The Rise of Junk Fees, Drip Pricing, and the Battle for Commercial Transparency

At the forefront of twenty-first century consumer protection issues is corporate price-gouging. Among the most notable examples is the issue of “junk fees” or “drip pricing,” fees which are not initially visible in the list price of goods and service, but are surreptitiously added to the price total by the close of the transaction. Recently, media reports have spotlighted numerous industries implicated by the “hidden pricing” phenomenon, including commercial travel, finance and banking, hospitality, entertainment, and more. Common examples include mandatory fees i.e. common addition of a 3-5 % surcharge added to your bill by a restaurant or concert venue, or an unexplained cleaning fee charged by a hotel at checkout. Perhaps now more than ever, U.S. consumers rely on state and federal government regulators to clarify, enforce, and update statutes for twenty-first century demands, ever emerging technologies, and a modern consumer economy.  

Will AI Replace Compliance Professionals?

The rapid development of automation, artificial intelligence (AI), and Regulatory Technology (RegTech) has officially begun transforming the regulatory compliance landscape. Financial institutions and corporations are facing an increasingly complex web of regulations, rising compliance costs, and growing expectations from regulators. In response, organizations are turning to automated systems to streamline monitoring, reporting, and risk management. These technological advancements have sparked an important question within the industry: will automation eventually replace compliance professionals? While automation is reshaping the compliance function and technology is transforming the profession by automating routine tasks, there may still be a need for human oversight, interpretation, and strategic decision-making after all.

Why San Francisco’s Lawsuit Should Be a Turning Point in the Regulation of Ultra-Processed Foods

Ultra-processed foods are causing chronic health issues in Americans. The FDA regulates 80% of food products in the United States, yet there is little regulation regarding ultra-processed foods. Cities across the U.S. are taking their own steps towards regulation in order to protect their residents. San Francisco’s recent lawsuit marks an important step forward in regulating ultra-processed foods here in the United States. This lawsuit could be a turning point in regulation for the U.S., as it highlights the dangers of ultra-processed foods, the effects lackluster regulation has on communities, and how transparency can create a healthy step forward for Americans.