{"id":4829,"date":"2025-03-17T03:05:45","date_gmt":"2025-03-17T03:05:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/?p=4829"},"modified":"2025-03-17T16:05:26","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T16:05:26","slug":"no-offense-but-can-this-trademark-be-registered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/no-offense-but-can-this-trademark-be-registered\/","title":{"rendered":"No Offense, But Can This Trademark Be Registered?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mceTemp\"><\/div>\n<p><em>A primer on the immoral or offensive bar to trademark registration<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"mceTemp\"><\/div>\n<p>Trademarks are all around us\u2014from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/legal\/intellectual-property\/trademark\/appletmlist.html\">Apple symbol emblazoned on a MacBook<\/a> to a \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bkstr.com\/loyolachicagostore\/product\/crew-9oz-1c-fsn-se-oatht-xs---118473-1\">Loyola Chicago\u201d logo<\/a> printed on a sweatshirt. (Spot <em>three<\/em> trademarks in that sentence!) Trademarks exist across different industries and evoke different things to a consumer. However, all trademarks serve an essential purpose: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/trademarks\/basics\/what-trademark#:~:text=A%20trademark%20can%20be%20any,both%20trademarks%20and%20service%20marks.\">to identify and distinguish<\/a> a good or service in commerce from others\u2019 goods and services.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What is a Trademark?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Trademarks include <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/trademarks\/basics\/what-trademark#:~:text=A%20trademark%20can%20be%20any,both%20trademarks%20and%20service%20marks.\">words, symbols, or \u201cdevices\u201d<\/a> (or a combination of these) that serve as specific source identifiers to a product or service in commerce. This helps consumers quickly identify the source and minimize confusion in the marketplace. A valid trademark enables companies to distinguish their goods or services in the marketplace. To maintain a valid trademark, a trademark owner must continuously use the mark in commerce, and it must remain distinctive. For additional legal benefits, someone can seek official registration with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/\">United States Patent and Trademark Office<\/a> (USPTO).<\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court cases like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/16pdf\/15-1293_1o13.pdf\"><em>Matal v. Tam<\/em><\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/18pdf\/18-302_e29g.pdf\"><em>Iancu v. Brunetti<\/em><\/a> illustrate how trademark registration can involve interesting and sometimes controversial issues. But first, let\u2019s talk about the benefits of trademark registration.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trademark Registration: How Does it Work and Why Do It?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>An unregistered trademark is at a disadvantage in legal disputes.\u00a0 The unregistered trademark does not have any presumption of validity in legal disputes.\u00a0 So, the mark owner would need to establish the basics of why there is a trademark, including that it was used in commerce, and why it is distinctive in the marketplace. In addition, the owner of an unregistered mark may only be able to stop subsequent use of the mark in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justia.com\/intellectual-property\/trademarks\/unregistered-trademarks\/\">specific geographic area<\/a> in which the business operates.<\/p>\n<p>Federally registered marks receive an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/trademarks\/basics\/why-register-your-trademark\">arsenal of legal protection<\/a> and benefits that are not available to unregistered marks. For one, when a trademark owner wants to bring a lawsuit against another for allegedly violating their mark, a federally registered trademark is presumed valid. This helps streamline their case.<\/p>\n<p>Registration also provides <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawgroup.biz\/pros-cons-principal-register-vs-supplemental-register#:~:text=Enhanced%20Remedies%3A%20registration%20on%20the,in%20case%20of%20trademark%20infringement.\">constructive notice<\/a> of ownership nationwide. In lawsuits, this is helpful for trademark owners since other companies and people are presumed to be aware of the trademark. This benefits trademark owners by preventing infringers from claiming they adopted a similar mark in good faith and strengthening the owner\u2019s enforcement rights in legal disputes.<\/p>\n<p>And registration can bring financial rewards.\u00a0 Federally registered marks are given <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawgroup.biz\/pros-cons-principal-register-vs-supplemental-register#:~:text=Enhanced%20Remedies%3A%20registration%20on%20the,in%20case%20of%20trademark%20infringement.\">enhanced remedies<\/a> like statutory damages and attorney\u2019s fees in trademark infringement suits.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4830\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4830\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-4830\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/charlesdeluvio-FK81rxilUXg-unsplash-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/charlesdeluvio-FK81rxilUXg-unsplash-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/charlesdeluvio-FK81rxilUXg-unsplash-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/charlesdeluvio-FK81rxilUXg-unsplash-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/charlesdeluvio-FK81rxilUXg-unsplash-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/charlesdeluvio-FK81rxilUXg-unsplash-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/charlesdeluvio-FK81rxilUXg-unsplash-135x90.jpg 135w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4830\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Trademarks help distinguish goods and services in the marketplace. Source: Unsplash<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The owner of a federally registered mark can also stop the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/trademarks\/basics\/why-register-your-trademark\">importation of an infringing product<\/a> at the border. Federal registration allows an owner to register the mark with the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol.<\/p>\n<p>Given all these benefits, why wouldn\u2019t everyone register?\u00a0 One reason is that registration may not be possible. Federal registration of a mark comes with <a href=\"https:\/\/crsreports.congress.gov\/product\/pdf\/IF\/IF12456#:~:text=Trademark%20Requirements,nonfunctional%2C%20and%20used%20in%20commerce.\">a few requirements<\/a>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The mark must be on goods or services used in commerce<\/li>\n<li>The mark must be distinctive and nonfunctional (it cannot include useful or necessary characteristics of the good)<\/li>\n<li>The mark must not be statutorily barred.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This blog focuses on that last prong: the statutory bars to trademark registration.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What are Subject Matter Bars?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The third requirement for registration includes <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/15\/1052\">subject matter bars<\/a> outlined in the Lanham Act. These bars prohibit federal registration of certain types of marks.\u00a0 What are some examples?\u00a0 One bar is the flag of any state or country.\u00a0 Another is the name or signature of a living individual without their consent.<\/p>\n<p>One of these bars, called the \u201cdisparagement clause,\u201d intersected with First Amendment law. The clause restricted trademark registration that consisted of \u201cimmoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage\u201d persons alive or dead. These restrictions led to legal challenges from trademark applicants who argued that denying registration based on moral judgments violated their First Amendment rights. Luckily for many, this bar no longer exists thanks to the Supreme Court\u2019s decisions in <em>Matal v. Tam<\/em> and <em>Iancu v. Brunetti<\/em>.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4835\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4835\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-4835 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/sigmund-Eq849Z-UN88-unsplash-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/sigmund-Eq849Z-UN88-unsplash-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/sigmund-Eq849Z-UN88-unsplash-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/sigmund-Eq849Z-UN88-unsplash-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/sigmund-Eq849Z-UN88-unsplash-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/sigmund-Eq849Z-UN88-unsplash-2048x1536.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/sigmund-Eq849Z-UN88-unsplash-120x90.jpg 120w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4835\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>Supreme Court cases like Matal v. Tam, where a singer of a rock band tried to trademark his band name &#8220;The Slants&#8221; illustrate how trademark registration can involve interesting and sometimes controversial issues. Source: Unsplash.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong><em>Matal<\/em><\/strong><strong> Court Strikes the Disparagement Clause<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Until <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/16pdf\/15-1293_1o13.pdf\"><em>Matal v. Tam<\/em><\/a> was decided in 2017, the \u201cdisparagement clause\u201d was good law.<\/p>\n<p>Decided in 2017, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/16pdf\/15-1293_1o13.pdf\"><em>Matal v. Tam<\/em><\/a> was a seminal case for trademark registration because it declared the disparagement clause unconstitutional. In <em>Matal<\/em>, the lead singer of a band called \u201cThe Slants\u201d applied to register the band name as a trademark. The singer, Simon Tam, explained that the band name reclaims the derogatory term used against Asians, ultimately \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/16pdf\/15-1293_1o13.pdf\">drain[ing] its denigrating force<\/a>\u201d as a slur.<\/p>\n<p>The USPTO initially rejected the registration and Tam appealed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). After losing there, Tam appealed to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which found for Tam. Ultimately, this case reached the Supreme Court. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court found that the disparagement clause violated the First Amendment as a form of viewpoint discrimination.<\/p>\n<p>Before <em>Matal v. Tam<\/em>, the disparagement clause was the legal foundation for <a href=\"https:\/\/abc7chicago.com\/sports\/judge-upholds-ruling-against-redskins-trademark;-team-to-appeal\/835877\/\">cancelling trademark registration<\/a> for the Washington Redskins in 2015. The TTAB and a federal district court found that the mark may be disparaging to Native Americans. Even earlier, in 1959, the TTAB refused to register a proposed mark \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpfirm.com\/news-resources\/supreme-court-says-trademarks-can-politically-incorrect\/\">SENUSSI<\/a>\u201d for cigarettes. It held that the proposed mark is the name of a Muslim sect that forbids the use of cigarettes and thus would be \u201can affront to such persons and tends to disparage their beliefs.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Now, because of <em>Matal, <\/em>marks that might have once been deemed as disparaging of people alive or dead are now eligible for registration. Of course, they need to meet other requirements too, such as distinctiveness and use in commerce.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4834\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4834\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-4834 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Slants-Trademark-Search-300x208.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"208\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Slants-Trademark-Search-300x208.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Slants-Trademark-Search-130x90.png 130w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Slants-Trademark-Search.png 644w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4834\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>The Slants have a registered trademark now for use in entertainment as a musical band. Source: USPTO Trademark Search.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>What does <em>Matal\u2019s <\/em>decision mean?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Matal <\/em>had an immediate impact in trademark registration litigation. Just 10 days after the decision, Native American advocacy groups and the Justice Department (DOJ) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/local\/public-safety\/2017\/06\/29\/a26f52f0-5cf6-11e7-9fc6-c7ef4bc58d13_story.html?noredirect=on\">abandoned their legal battle<\/a> in federal appeals court. The case was against Pro-Football, Inc. which owned the Washington Redskins marks. The advocacy groups and DOJ no longer had strong legal grounds, even though they had won in lower courts.<\/p>\n<p>The Court doubled down 2 years later in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/18pdf\/18-302_e29g.pdf\"><em>Iancu v. Brunetti<\/em><\/a>. This time, it found that the Lanham Act\u2019s prohibition on registering \u201cimmoral\u201d or \u201cscandalous\u201d trademarks violated the First Amendment. The Court held that these bars similarly exercised viewpoint discrimination as the now-defunct disparagement clause. In <em>Iancu<\/em>, the respondent sought to register the trademark \u201cFUCT\u201d for his clothing line. This decision dealt another blow to the disparagement clause. The Court pointed out that the PTO has rejected drug-related marks for being \u201cscandalous.\u201d For example, it rejected a \u201cYOU CAN\u2019T SPELL HEALTHCARE WITHOUT THC\u201d mark for pain relief medication. <em>Iancu<\/em> opens up registration eligibility for marks that might have been deemed immoral or scandalous like curse words.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4831\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4831\" style=\"width: 237px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-4831 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ben-hershey-eo3ePy_iWoE-unsplash-237x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"237\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ben-hershey-eo3ePy_iWoE-unsplash-237x300.jpg 237w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ben-hershey-eo3ePy_iWoE-unsplash-808x1024.jpg 808w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ben-hershey-eo3ePy_iWoE-unsplash-768x973.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ben-hershey-eo3ePy_iWoE-unsplash-1212x1536.jpg 1212w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ben-hershey-eo3ePy_iWoE-unsplash-1616x2048.jpg 1616w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ben-hershey-eo3ePy_iWoE-unsplash-71x90.jpg 71w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ben-hershey-eo3ePy_iWoE-unsplash-scaled.jpg 2020w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 237px) 100vw, 237px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4831\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>The \u201dWashington Redskins\u201d mark for the professional football team was a litigated mark. Source: Unsplash. <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>How has <em>Matal <\/em>and<em> Iancu C<\/em>hanged the Trademark Registration Game?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019re keeping track, here\u2019s what is no longer a valid subject matter bar: the disparagement clause and the bar for \u201cimmoral\u201d and \u201cscandalous\u201d marks.<\/p>\n<p>There are some trademarks that can now be registered even if the disparagement clause once barred registration. There\u2019s the Washington Redskins, a once-contested mark for the D.C.-area football team. There are a handful of Redskins marks for use in things like trading cards. Though, the team is now called the Washington Commanders due to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2022\/02\/06\/1078571919\/washington-commanders-name-change-native-americans\">same community pressures<\/a> that inspired litigation in the first place. There\u2019s also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.slantd.com\/\">Slant\u2019d<\/a>, an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.financialpoise.com\/matal-v-tam-trademark-disparagement\/\">Asian American magazine<\/a> that reimagines accessible publishing for Asian Americans. And you guessed it\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/fuct.com\/us\/home\">FUCT<\/a>\u2014for the fashion label.<\/p>\n<p>It is difficult to show through numbers how <em>Matal <\/em>and <em>Iancu<\/em> have impacted the number of trademark registrations, but some groups have tried. Reuters reported a month after <em>Matal<\/em>, at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/idUSKBN1A80KV\/\">least nine applications<\/a> using \u201cracially charged words and symbols for their products\u201d like the swastika were filed. But if you look in the USPTO\u2019s trademark search, there are no approved swastika trademarks. In 2020, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.financialpoise.com\/matal-v-tam-trademark-disparagement\/\">Financial Poise<\/a> noted that most applications for \u201carguably disparaging trademarks seem to be similar\u201d to <em>Matal<\/em>. It says that these cases are brought forth by marginalized groups that want to reclaim a term.<\/p>\n<p>Groups like The Slants now can reclaim once harmful language into something empowering <em>and <\/em>enjoy all of the great legal protections from the USPTO.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-4833\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Maris-Medina-Headshot-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Maris-Medina-Headshot-300x200.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Maris-Medina-Headshot-1024x683.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Maris-Medina-Headshot-768x512.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Maris-Medina-Headshot-1536x1024.jpeg 1536w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Maris-Medina-Headshot-135x90.jpeg 135w, https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Maris-Medina-Headshot.jpeg 1800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><em>Maris Medina<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Senior Editor<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Loyola University Chicago School of Law, J.D. 2025<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A primer on the immoral or offensive bar to trademark registration Trademarks are all around us\u2014from the Apple symbol emblazoned on a MacBook to a \u201cLoyola Chicago\u201d logo printed on a sweatshirt. (Spot three trademarks in that sentence!) Trademarks exist across different industries and evoke different things to a consumer. However, all trademarks serve an essential purpose: to identify and distinguish a good or service &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/no-offense-but-can-this-trademark-be-registered\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">No Offense, But Can This Trademark Be Registered?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":53,"featured_media":4835,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4829","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-trademarks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4829","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/53"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4829"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4829\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4838,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4829\/revisions\/4838"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4835"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/ipbytes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}