{"id":1523,"date":"2018-02-15T06:00:47","date_gmt":"2018-02-15T11:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/?p=1523"},"modified":"2018-02-15T06:00:47","modified_gmt":"2018-02-15T11:00:47","slug":"trump-administration-deregulates-financial-services","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/?p=1523","title":{"rendered":"Trump Administration Deregulates Financial Services"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Richard W. Shepherd<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Associate Editor<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Loyola University Chicago School of Law, JD 2019<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/interactives\/tracking-deregulation-in-the-trump-era\/\">delivering<\/a> on its promise to deregulate America.\u00a0 Since taking office, numerous regulations spanning everything from energy to health care have been repealed or weakened.\u00a0 The financial services industry is not immune to the deregulation movement.\u00a0 The Trump administration is acting through appointments, executive agencies, and legislation to deregulate the financial services industry.\u00a0 Proponents of deregulation claim the movement is needed after Dodd-Frank and strict post-financial crisis regulation.\u00a0 However, in deregulating financial services, the Trump Administration\u2014and compliance professionals\u2014should proceed cautiously.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>Deregulation Through Legislation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Since its passing in 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd Frank) has seen more than its fair share of controversy.\u00a0 The legislation created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), numerous new regulations, and overall was the most significant overhaul of the industry since the Great Depression.\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Baily-Klein-PPTF-1.pdf\">Reaction<\/a> to the legislation has been mixed, with proponents claiming the new rules and consumer protections are vital to economic stability, while opponents claim the legislation is an overreaction to the financial crisis.<\/p>\n<p>In June 2017, Republicans in the House of Representatives passed the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2017\/06\/08\/house-has-votes-to-pass-choice-act-that-would-gut-dodd-frank-banking-reforms.html\">Financial CHOICE Act<\/a>, which would allow banks to escape heightened scrutiny, cut back on stress testing, and significantly limit the authority of the CFPB.\u00a0 The Senate is currently working on a bipartisan Dodd Frank reform bill, which will likely be less extreme than the House bill.\u00a0 President Trump <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/finance\/369224-trump-calls-for-looser-rules-for-bank-loans-mortgages-in-dodd-frank-overhaul\">supports<\/a> the effort.<\/p>\n<p>Any effort to deregulate financial services must be <a href=\"https:\/\/www.economist.com\/news\/schoolsbrief\/21584534-effects-financial-crisis-are-still-being-felt-five-years-article\">cautious<\/a> when dealing with subprime lending, collateralized debt obligations, capital levels, and liquidity controls.\u00a0 The goal of any reform to Dodd Frank should seek to balance the needs of economic growth with stabilizing controls and regulation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Deregulation Through Appointments <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the easiest way for President Trump to significantly change financial regulation is through executive appointments.\u00a0 Directors of executive agencies have significant influence over the policy, enforcement, and culture of federal regulators.\u00a0 Trump has already made several appointments which could drastically change the landscape of financial regulation.<\/p>\n<p>President Trump <a href=\"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2018\/02\/03\/federal-reseve-chair-jerome-powell\/\">appointed<\/a> Jerome Powell as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, replacing Janet Yellen.\u00a0 President Trump declined to reappoint Ms. Yellen, an Obama appointee, when her term expired.\u00a0 Chairman Powell inherits an economy with low unemployment and inflation. \u00a0It\u2019s expected Chairman Powell will continue to gradually raise interest rates.\u00a0 Although the Fed maintains independence, presidents have often tried to influence the Fed\u2019s policies.\u00a0 Whether President Trump will be able to influence Chairman Powell or Federal Reserve policy remains to be seen.<\/p>\n<p>President Trump also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-usa-trump-otting\/joseph-otting-former-banker-sworn-in-as-top-u-s-bank-regulator-idUSKBN1DR2LB\">appointed<\/a> Joseph Otting as Comptroller of the Currency, replacing interim Comptroller Keith Noreika and Obama appointee Thomas Curry.\u00a0 The OCC is responsible for chartering, regulating, and supervising national banks and thrifts.\u00a0 Otting is a former banker with close ties to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.\u00a0 Otting was CEO of OneWest Bank, an institution co-founded by Mnuchin.\u00a0 During Otting\u2019s tenure, OneWest was criticized by their primary regulator, The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), for unsafe and unsound mortgage foreclosure practices.\u00a0 In 2011, the OTS was merged with the OCC, meaning Comptroller Otting is now leading a federal agency which held his bank under a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.occ.gov\/static\/ots\/misc-docs\/consent-orders-97665.pdf\">consent order<\/a>.\u00a0 The Comptroller is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2017\/11\/16\/joseph-otting-trump-currency-comptroller-165001\">expected<\/a> to be a key figure in the Trump deregulation effort.\u00a0 Comptroller Otting has already received <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/la-fi-occ-wells-fargo-20180117-story.html\">criticism<\/a> for the OCC\u2019s lack of enforcement in the wake of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=9zeH-S3A6pg\">Wells Fargo<\/a> scandal.\u00a0 Senate democrats claim the OCC has failed to make progress on any of the regulatory recommendations made to Wells Fargo in April 2017.<\/p>\n<p>Along with Otting and Powell, President Trump appointed Mick Mulvaney as the Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).\u00a0 Acting Director Mulvaney replaced Richard Cordray, an Obama appointee, who resigned to run for Governor of Ohio.\u00a0 There was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/11\/24\/us\/politics\/consumer-financial-protection-bureau-cordray-leader-trump-mulvaney.html\">significant controversy<\/a> following Mr. Cordray\u2019s resignation and Trump\u2019s appointment; a controversy that is still ongoing.\u00a0 However, that has not stopped Director Mulvaney from implementing President Trump\u2019s plan to weaken the CFPB.\u00a0 The CFPB has been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.housingwire.com\/articles\/42443-did-mick-mulvaney-just-drastically-change-how-the-cfpb-enforces-fair-lending-laws\">stripped<\/a> of the power to pursue discrimination cases related to fair lending laws, has been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/research\/cfpbs-retreat-from-collecting-mortgage-data-should-sound-alarm-bells\/\">limited<\/a> on the ability to collect mortgage data, has <a href=\"http:\/\/nymag.com\/daily\/intelligencer\/2018\/01\/the-cfpb-is-now-the-predatory-lender-protection-bureau.html\">ended<\/a> multiple <a href=\"https:\/\/www.americanbanker.com\/news\/cfpb-drops-probe-into-lender-that-gave-to-mulvaneys-campaigns\">investigations<\/a> into payday lenders, has begun to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/mick-mulvaney-cant-legally-kill-the-cfpb-so-hes-starving-it-instead\/2018\/01\/25\/4481d2ce-0216-11e8-8acf-ad2991367d9d_story.html?utm_term=.aef85665d935\">delay and revisit<\/a> new regulations, and has decided to stop enforcing some regulations all together.<\/p>\n<p>When he was a congressman, Director Mulvaney co-sponsored a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/114th-congress\/house-bill\/3118\/cosponsors?overview=closed#tabs\">bill<\/a> to eliminate the CFPB.\u00a0\u00a0 As Director, he lacks the power to kill the agency, but the Trump Administration is clearly seeking to make the CFPB irrelevant.\u00a0 Recently, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2018\/01\/31\/consumer-protection-bureau-structure-upheld-in-blow-to-trumps-deregulation-efforts.html\">upheld<\/a> the structure of the CFPB as constitutional, in a blow to the Trump Administration.\u00a0 The decision sets up a likely Supreme Court review of the constitutionality of the CFPB.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Looking Forward<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Trump Administration would be wise to proceed cautiously in deregulating financial services.\u00a0 While deregulating financial institutions may promote economic growth, it may also <a href=\"https:\/\/publications.lakeforest.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&amp;context=seniortheses\">create<\/a> the right environment for another financial crisis.\u00a0 For compliance professionals, the environment creates significant uncertainty.\u00a0 With an administration and regulators implementing looser requirements, or simply not enforcing regulations all together, institutions need to be cautious moving forward.\u00a0 Compliance professionals should consider the risk tolerance of their institution, while balancing what new opportunities may be available in a deregulated environment, as well as maintaining a reasonable system of controls.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Trump administration is delivering on its promise to deregulate America.\u00a0 Since taking office, numerous regulations spanning everything from energy to health care have been repealed or weakened.\u00a0 The financial services industry is not immune to the deregulation movement.\u00a0 The Trump administration is acting through appointments, executive agencies, and legislation to deregulate the financial services industry.\u00a0 Proponents of deregulation claim the movement is needed after Dodd-Frank and strict post-financial crisis regulation.\u00a0 However, in deregulating financial services, the Trump Administration\u2014and compliance professionals\u2014should proceed cautiously.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[252,369,468,834,851,1458,1690,2016],"class_list":["post-1523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-finance-banking","tag-banking","tag-cfpb","tag-compliance","tag-federal-reserve","tag-finance","tag-occ","tag-regulation","tag-trump"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1523\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.luc.edu\/compliance\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}