Footnotes for Confronting Prejudice Combats Everyday Injustice

Posted on: November 20th, 2013

Footnotes for “Confronting Prejudice Combats Everyday Injustice

[1]  Fitzgerald, L.F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn’t she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117-138. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01312.x

Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me – what did you just say ?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1370

Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 15-30. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00199

[2]  Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., Fitzgerald, D. C., & Bylsma, W. H. (2003). African American college students’ experiences with everyday racism: Characteristics of and responses to these incidents. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 38-67.

Swim, J. K., Cohen, L. L., & Hyers, L. L. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 1, 31-53. DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00200

Swim, J. K., Johnston, K., & Pearson, N. B. (2009). Daily experiences with heterosexism: Relations between heterosexist hassles and psychological well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 28, 5, 597-629.

[3]  Ford, T.E. & Ferguson, M.A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 1, 79-94. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4

Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211411723

[4] Good, J.  J., Moss-Racusin, C. A. & Sanchez, D.  T. (2012). When do we confront? Perceptions of costs and benefits predict confronting discrimination on behalf of the self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 210-226. doi: 10.1177/0361684312440958

Shelton, J. & Stewart, R. (2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215-223. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x

[5] Plous, S. (2000). Responding to overt displays of prejudice: A role-playing exercise. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 3, 198-200.

[6] Czopp, A.M., Monteith, M.J. & Mark, A.Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784-803. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784

[7] Mallett, R. K. & Wagner, D. E. (2010). The unexpectedly positive consequences of confrontation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 215-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.001

<< Back to the article

Loyola University Chicago's Social Justice Web Portal is designed to provide a positive environment for the Loyola community to discuss important issues and ideas. Differences of opinion are encouraged. We invite comments in response to posts and ask that you write in a civil and respectful manner. Comments will be screened for tone and content. All comments must include the first and last name of the author and a valid e-mail address. The appearance of comments on the Web Portal does not imply the University's endorsement or acceptance of views expressed.

Comments are closed.