<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Katherine Macica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on History Museum Websites Critique by Mary Anne Lauby</title>
		<link>http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/2012/02/23/history-museum-websites-critique/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Anne Lauby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/?p=88#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Did you know that &quot;research shows&quot; that when most people look at/read/scan a web site, they do so in a letter &quot;F&quot; shape?  So you can see that if you don&#039;t have your most important information in the top few lines and left-hand side, your reader may not get to what you want them to see.  Our interest/attention span is pathetic!   Good information here on the museum sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that &#8220;research shows&#8221; that when most people look at/read/scan a web site, they do so in a letter &#8220;F&#8221; shape?  So you can see that if you don&#8217;t have your most important information in the top few lines and left-hand side, your reader may not get to what you want them to see.  Our interest/attention span is pathetic!   Good information here on the museum sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks, Photoshop! by Amelia Serafine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/2012/02/22/thanks-photoshop/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia Serafine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/?p=80#comment-47</guid>
		<description>This is an awesome use of photoshop. I could definitely spend hours adding Danish Modern furniture to my dream Eichler house!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an awesome use of photoshop. I could definitely spend hours adding Danish Modern furniture to my dream Eichler house!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Value of Reproductions by Katherine Macica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/2012/02/09/the-value-of-reproductions/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Macica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/?p=62#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting!  I agree (obviously) - if recreations were just as valuable as the original, why is there a market for fine art and antiques?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting!  I agree (obviously) &#8211; if recreations were just as valuable as the original, why is there a market for fine art and antiques?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Value of Reproductions by Mary Anne Lauby</title>
		<link>http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/2012/02/09/the-value-of-reproductions/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Anne Lauby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/?p=62#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I agree with you AND the National Register.   Recreating something, no matter how perfectly accurate, is just not the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you AND the National Register.   Recreating something, no matter how perfectly accurate, is just not the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Digital Immigrant Encounters Twitter by Kyle Roberts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/2012/02/01/a-digital-immigrant-encounters-twitter/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.luc.edu/kmacica/?p=44#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Love the picture of the analog immigrants!

I think you raise a fascinating question about whether our native or immigrant status is an individual or community identity.  One of the issues with Prensky is his binarism. Surely his categories, if they are at all useful, represent a spectrum of literacies and (as your reflection on the absence of acquaintances who likely have a social media footprint in Facebook, Google+, what have you) engagements.  Just because some one grew up with digital based applications means they know how to use them - or want to use them! 

Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the picture of the analog immigrants!</p>
<p>I think you raise a fascinating question about whether our native or immigrant status is an individual or community identity.  One of the issues with Prensky is his binarism. Surely his categories, if they are at all useful, represent a spectrum of literacies and (as your reflection on the absence of acquaintances who likely have a social media footprint in Facebook, Google+, what have you) engagements.  Just because some one grew up with digital based applications means they know how to use them &#8211; or want to use them! </p>
<p>Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
