About the new Inside Loyola

LOYOLA LINKS

Go

A one-stop-shop of Loyola's most popular and useful Web resources.

A - Z Index

DIRECTORIES

 

Loyalty, Critique, or Exist!

In 1970 , business theorist and economist, Albert O. Hirschman, published a book entitled Exit, Voice, and Loyalty.

As a student of business ethics, this book helped to shape my intellectual and philosophical perspectives on a person’s real life options when confronted by organizational mistakes, mismanagement, misbehavior, and/or mischievousness.  I’m not sure if Professor Hirschman would agree with my interpretation of his overall thesis, but it’s a model I’ve been effectively using in the classroom for years.

When an organization makes a mistake, starts moving in the wrong direction, or does something blatantly wrong or illegal, I think members of that organization, from top to bottom, are forced to a choice about what they should do.

The first choice is loyalty.  On the one hand, loyalty suggests agreement.  “Whatever the organization or company is doing – I see no problem with it!”  Loyalty can be the product of fear.  “If I speak up, will I lose my job?”  Loyalty can be a product of indifference.  “What do I care, I just want to get paid.”  Or loyalty can be the result of genuine uncertainty – “I’m unwilling to cast the first stone.”

The second choice is critique or criticism.  To criticize does not necessarily mean to be negative or to deny.  To be critical means to evaluate.  Criticism implies taking something apart in order to understand it and make it better.  To criticize is to add one’s voice to the conversation or controversy.  To critique is to be engaged, concerned, and to be responsive to the situation facing an organization.

Finally, there is exist.  To leave, to move on, to exit – can be either a demonstration of character or cowardice.  To have voiced one’s disapproval .  To have argued for change.  To have argued for correction, but to have all of this fail – then exist is a demonstration of integrity and strength.  But to leave, out of fear of personal reprisal or recrimination, without due concern for others who might be innocently involved– is the act of a cad.

Hirschman taught me that in trying times we are all tested.  The choices we face are tough ones, but choices must be made.  Neutrality, as Dante pointed out, is never a viable option:  “The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.”

  • By Camille on 6.1.2013 at 4:04 pm

    Is there a reason we are unable to share via social networks?

  • By Camille on 6.1.2013 at 4:05 pm

    Retracted.

Add a Comment

(required)

(will not be displayed) (required)